Educating Learners

Empowering dreamers.

Why EEaccreditation
Governance and Quality
Financial Model
Accreditation Framework
Accreditation Criteria

Accreditation Criteria

Transparent Accreditation Process

At Educating Excellence, we are committed to full transparency. All accreditation criteria, process steps, and required documentation are clearly outlined and made accessible to applicants throughout the entire accreditation journey.

Clear standards for course design, delivery, and assessment.

A 5-step review from application to certification.

 

Templates and checklists to support compliance and quality.

 

Universal Accreditation Criteria

Learning Design

  • Curriculum Coherence
    Sub-area
    • Criteria: Each course must define clear learning objectives aligned with content and assessment
    • Evidence Required: Course syllabus with learning outcomes, Learning outcome matrix
    • Audit Indicators: Min. 4 SMART learning outcomes per course, Clear mapping of outcome → module → assessment
  • Pedagogical Logic
    Sub-area
    • Criteria: Curriculum must be modular and build progressively
    • Evidence Required: Module outline,Visual curriculum map
    • Audit Indicators: Min. 3 modules, Evidence of progression (intro → intermediate → advanced)
  • Inclusivity & Accessibility
    Sub-area
    • Criteria: Course design must support neurodiverse and disadvantaged learners
    • Evidence Required: Accessibility checklist (e.g., WCAG 2.1 AA), Adaptation policy
    • Audit Indicators: Min. 2 accommodations available (e.g., alternative formats), Accessible materials provided
  • Technology-Enhanced Learning
    Sub-area
    • Criteria: Technology must add value to pedagogy
    • Evidence Required: List of tools & purpose, Screenshots or recordings
    • Audit Indicators: At least 2 learner interaction tools (polls, LMS forums, breakout rooms) used per course

Delivery

  • Trainer Qualifications
    Sub-area
    • Criteria: All instructors must meet academic and teaching requirements
    • Evidence Required: CVs + Diplomas, Teaching certificates or CPD proof
    • Audit Indicators: Subject-matter degree: min EQF Level 6, 2+ years teaching or training experience
  • Methodology
    Sub-area
    • Criteria: Active learning methods must be systematically used
    • Evidence Required: Sample lesson plan, Session recording
    • Audit Indicators: At least 3 active techniques per course (case study, role play, Q&A)
  • Learner Engagement
    Sub-area
    • Criteria: Learners must be continuously engaged and supported
    • Evidence Required: Learner journey plan, Support staff list
    • Audit Indicators: Dedicated contact person named, Response time policy (<48h) published
  • Digital Standards
    Sub-area
    • Criteria: Online delivery must meet interactivity and reliability standards
    • Evidence Required: LMS screenshots, Attendance or interaction reports
    • Audit Indicators: Dropout rate < 20%, Participant activity in > 60% of sessions

Learning Outcomes & Assessment

  • Assessment Alignment
    Sub-area
    • Criteria: Assessments must evaluate what is taught
    • Evidence Required: Assessment blueprint, Example assessment
    • Audit Indicators: One summative and one formative assessment per course, Outcome-assessment mapping
  • Outcome Achievement
    Sub-area
    • Criteria: Learner performance must be documented
    • Evidence Required: Learner performance records, Pre-/post-test samples
    • Audit Indicators: 70% learners meet stated learning outcomes
  • Certification Transparency
    Sub-area
    • Criteria: Certification process must be fair and documented
    • Evidence Required: Grading policy, Certificate template
    • Audit Indicators: Pass/fail criteria published, Audit log of certificate issuance
  • Feedback Integration
    Sub-area
    • Criteria: Learner feedback must be collected and used
    • Evidence Required: Feedback forms (min. 5 questions), Improvement log
    • Audit Indicators: 70% learner satisfaction, Documented updates based on feedback

Universal Accreditation process

  • Institution submits application & required documents
    Application
    • Institution submits application & required documents
    • Course descriptions
    • Trainer CVs
  • EE performs document and eligibility review
    Pre-Audit Screening
    • Compliance checklist
    • Initial feedback report
  • Structured review of practices, systems, and delivery
    Audit (on-site or virtual)
    • Audit plan
    • Interviews with trainers and QA staff
    • Evidence samples collected
  • EE issues a findings report; provider may respond
    Feedback & Correction Loop
    • Corrective action plan (CAP)
    • Supporting documents
  • Final review panel awards (or denies) accreditation
    Certification Decision
    • Accreditation decision letter
    • Certificate with expiry date (2–3 years)

Accreditation Process

  • Institution submits application & required documents
    Application
    • Institution submits application & required documents
    • Course descriptions
    • Trainer CVs
  • EE performs document and eligibility review
    Pre-Audit Screening
    • Compliance checklist
    • Initial feedback report
  • Structured review of practices, systems, and delivery
    Audit (on-site or virtual)
    • Audit plan
    • Interviews with trainers and QA staff
    • Evidence samples collected
  • EE issues a findings report; provider may respond
    Feedback & Correction Loop
    • Corrective action plan (CAP)
    • Supporting documents
  • Final review panel awards (or denies) accreditation
    Certification Decision
    • Accreditation decision letter
    • Certificate with expiry date (2–3 years)

Audit Tools & Self-Assessment Templates

  • Helps providers check readiness
    Self-Assessment Template (pdf)
    • All 3 categories (Design, Delivery, Outcomes)
    • Yes/No with space for evidence
    • Color-coded compliance levels
  • Used by EE auditors to standardize evaluations
    Audit Checklist (PDF)
    • 30+ measurable indicators
    • Space for notes and scores
    • Traffic-light system
  • Ensures all trainer qualifications are standardized
    Trainer File Template
    • Required: CV, degree, certificate, 2 references
  • For providers to gather structured feedback
    Learner Feedback Template
    • 5-point Likert scale
    • Optional open feedback section
    • Anonymous format (PDF or Google Form)